COLLECTED WISDOM™ on Multiple Employer Plans (MEP)
This page gathers relevant information related to DOL's proposed regulations on Multiple Employer Plans (MEP). Other items related to MEPs may also be covered.
This archive contains not only the most current material on the topic, but also older items that are still relevant, provide background, perspective or are germane to the topic.
If you find a broken link or an items that you feel is outdate, irrelevant or no longer appropriate, please let us know.
Abstract: Should the SECURE Act become law and permit open multiple employer plans to exist without a common nexus, one of the biggest benefits for advisers will be the increased ability to scale their practices. But, open MEPs, as detailed in the SECURE Act, offer a structure for a small plan to get maximum fiduciary support, experts say, but the roles and responsibilities of all the parties involved can be hard to keep straight.
Source: Planadviser.com, July 2019
Abstract: IRS proposed regulations would ease the threat of plan disqualification due to "one bad apple" for multiple employer defined contribution plans that meet documentation, notice and process steps. This supplements proposed guidance from DOL in 2018 and efforts on the Hill to expand access to multiple employer plans.
Source: Buck.com, July 2019
Abstract: The IRS has proposed a rule that would make 401k multiple employer plans (MEPs) more attractive, especially for small employers, by addressing the risk posed to a MEP by one member's bad actions.
Source: Shrm.org, July 2019
Abstract: The new rules would provide relief for defined contribution MEPs that include a participating employer that jeopardizes the plan through failure to comply with certain qualified plan rules. Under the existing rules, one noncompliant employer within a MEP can disqualify the entire plan, creating significant problems for the other participating employers. If these proposed regulations become final, they will remove an important compliance hurdle for employers considering -- or already in -- a MEP.
Source: Ascensus.com, July 2019
Abstract: The proposed regulations provide a detailed road map for a defined contribution MEP to avoid disqualification in the event of a participating employer's qualification failure. As a threshold matter, the plan administrator must have established practices and procedures (formal or informal) that are reasonably designed to promote and facilitate overall compliance with applicable Code requirements, including procedures for obtaining information from participating employers to identify and correct errors (e.g., nondiscrimination testing, top-heavy contributions).
Source: Groom.com, July 2019
Abstract: The Department of Labor issued proposed regulations on October 22, 2018 that represent the first major step in changing its restrictions on multiple employer plans. However, this is just the first step, and does not change the landscape for Open MEPs.
Source: Cowdenassociates.com, July 2019
Abstract: The proposed reg is welcome as a purely technical and structural matter. But the relief may be mostly illusory. The "bad apple" problem has always sounded worse than it is and may have been able to be fixed by a simple adjustment to the Maximum penalty Amount rules under EPCRS, and to the rules as to who should be responsible for that penalty.
Source: Businessofbenefits.com, July 2019
Abstract: The IRS issued a proposed regulation to water down the "one bad apple" rule that critics claim has prevented broader uptake of certain retirement plans by employers. Under current rules, if one of the employers in a MEP makes a mistake the entire plan is disqualified. The IRS's proposal would "significantly curtail" this rule.
Source: Investmentnews.com (registration may be required), July 2019
Abstract: Cerulli Associates notes that the creation of open multiple-employer plans is expected to create an attractive new pool of assets within a defined contribution market that is otherwise mature and experiencing flat to negative growth. As of year-end 2018, MEP assets totaled $211 billion, which represents a 21% increase from 2015.
Source: Cerulli.com, June 2019
Abstract: How do we get a flat 401k market moving again? It's a question asked and answered by global research and consulting firm Cerulli Associates. The firm is looking hard at open MEPs as a catalyst for DC development, a space it says is mature and experiencing flat to negative growth. current legislative proposals, aimed at expanding retirement plan access for small business employees, will reduce or eliminate the "common nexus" requirement with their support of open MEPs.
Source: 401kspecialistmag.com, June 2019
Abstract: Legislation in the U.S. House proposes sweeping changes that could disrupt the current status quo in the retirement industry, increase the attractiveness in having a retirement plan for small employers, and result in an archetype shift for the advisers and recordkeeping providers who serve them. There are two potential pathways for the broad adoption of open multiple employer plans by small businesses, one driven by advisers and the other by recordkeepers.
Source: Planadviser.com, April 2019
Abstract: If legislation allowing for open multiple employer plans (MEPs) is passed, it will be a while before implementation, and changes it will bring will affect services and business models of nearly every stakeholder in the retirement plan industry.
Source: Plansponsor.com, February 2019
Abstract: One of the shiny new coins of the 401k realm is "Open MEPs." It's anticipated that Congress will pass legislation this year that permits Open MEPs. Legislation is needed because of DOL guidance that, in essence, prohibits MEPs that are "open" to all employers. But what is an Open Multiple Employer Plan? What other kinds of MEPs are there? How do the people that set up MEPs get paid?
Source: Fredreish.com, January 2019
Abstract: The Department of Labor is considering new rules to facilitate retirement saving in workplace retirement accounts for sole proprietors and the owners and workers of small businesses. While these rules are a small step in the right direction, Congress must simplify saving for retirement and other needs for all Americans. Congress and the Administration should work together to simplify saving for all Americans. Universal Savings Accounts should be first on their agenda.
Source: Heritage.org, January 2019
Abstract: Legislative changes are necessary in order to expand savings options even more. While MEPs are a step in the right direction, but MEP expansions are merely tweaking the edges of an overly complex retirement system in need of fundamental congressional reform. MEPs could even risk entrenching the current broken system.
Source: 401kspecialistmag.com, January 2019
Abstract: Multiple-employer plans, or MEPs, are all the rage these days. However, there are some restrictions around MEPs, namely that they provide a one-size-fits-all solution in a world where customization has become king. For that reason, there has been a movement toward the de-adoption of MEPs that is not only very real, but also sheds light on why MEPs are a good option for some plans and a poor fit for others.
Source: Investmentnews.com (registration may be required), January 2019
Abstract: The retirement coverage gap can and should be narrowed. While a variety of solutions are possible, there is a growing consensus in Washington that one of the broadest and most expedient ways would be to expand access to multiple employer plans, or MEPs, for small employers and their employees. This 12-page paper outlines the legislative and regulatory actions that would be needed to broaden access to MEPs. It also describes the features that a model MEP might incorporate.
Source: Prudential.com, December 2018
Abstract: TAG Resources' comment to the proposed MEP regulation which was filed with the DOL last week. The comment letter addresses the DOL's main concern in initially prohibiting non-PEO commercial enterprises from becoming MEP sponsors.
Source: Businessofbenefits.com, December 2018
Abstract: The Department of Labor, with its request for public comment, may be about to give Retirement Clearinghouse LLC the green light to proceed with its proposal to automatically transfer small balances from one 401k to another. Such an arrangement would dramatically reduce leakages from 401k plans.
Source: Marketwatch.com, December 2018
Abstract: Employers play a substantial role in helping employees prepare for retirement. Yet small businesses state that cost and other administrative concerns limit their ability to offer their employees access to a workplace retirement plan. This 12-page white paper suggests that open multiple employer plans (MEPs) offer a solution, allowing small businesses to band together under one workplace plan.
Source: Empower-Retirement.com, December 2018
Abstract: The Department of Labor is expanding what retirement plan advisers can offer small-business clients courtesy of new rules the agency proposed around multiple-employer plans. Labor's proposed rules on multiple-employer plans would let advisers aggregate clients in a single retirement plan.
Source: Investmentnews.com (registration may be required), December 2018
Abstract: The key legal issue here is that plans, including MEPs, must be adopted by an employer of employees covered under the plan. Up to now, the Department of Labor defined "employer" narrowly to preclude unrelated employers from adopting single plan MEPs. Unfortunately, these eagerly awaited regulations did not authorize the kind of MEP many wanted.
Source: 401ktv.com, November 2018
Abstract: The MEP proposal would allow certain small businesses to band together to offer more robust 401k plans to their employees and achieve significant savings. While the new regulation is certainly a step in the direction, it doesn't go as far as many had hoped. Thus, the future of open MEPs lies in the hands of a Congress that seems to be at a clear impasse going into the midterms.
Source: Lockton.com, November 2018
Abstract: President Trump issued an executive order in August directing the DOL to examine policies that expand the circumstances where employers, especially small- and mid-sized businesses, may sponsor or adopt a multi-employer plan as a workplace retirement savings option, subject to appropriate safeguards. In response, the DOL issued a proposed regulation on October 23 that clarifies who can sponsor or adopt an MEP. The regulation is meant to expand the use of open multiple employer plans, allowing different businesses to join an MEP.
Source: Callan.com, November 2018
Abstract: The success of these plans will largely depend on the nature of the guidance issued by the DOL at the president's direction or that of any legislation enacted by Congress. Advisers likely will have the opportunity to sponsor open MEPs and make them available to their small business clients; they also likely will be subject to ERISA, to at least some extent.
Source: Groom.com, November 2018
Abstract: Employers of all sizes that provide retirement plan coverage for all or a portion of their workforce through an association or leasing organization may benefit from new options presented by proposed DOL regulations. The proposal would simplify Form 5500 filing requirements and clarify fiduciary responsibilities.
Source: Buckglobal.com, November 2018
Abstract: The proposal isn't comprehensive enough to create sweeping changes. But, it may induce a few more entities to offer MEPs, possibly increasing retirement coverage and perhaps improving the quality of the retirement plans for some small businesses. The most significant impact of this proposal might be that it gives professional employer organizations a leg up in offering MEPs and might encourage more employers to join such organizations.
Source: Morningstar.com, November 2018
Abstract: Those industry stakeholders disappointed by the limited scope of the proposed regulations can take heart in the fact that DOL staff calls for detailed commentary on ways the proposal could be expanded, including into the area of "open MEPs" and "corporate MEPs."
Source: Planadviser.com, October 2018
Abstract: The Department of Labor issued proposed regulations on October 22, 2018, that represent the first major step in changing its restrictions on multiple employer plans. However, it is just the first step, and does not change the landscape for Open MEPs. The first part of the article gives a general description of what the proposal does and the second part takes a "deeper dive."
Source: Ferenczylaw.com, October 2018
Abstract: Under the proposed DOL rule, MEPs could be created by associations of employers in various cities, counties, states, or regions or nationwide across an industry. The proposal states that such groups will now qualify as "employers" under the terms of ERISA for the purpose of setting up an individual employee pension plan.
Source: Blr.com, October 2018
Abstract: The Department of Labor has issued proposed regulations clarifying the definition of "employer" under Section 3(5) of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA) for purposes of multiple employer plans (MEPs), also referred to as association retirement plans in the proposal.
Source: Westlaw.com, October 2018
Abstract: While there are generally four types of MEPs, the proposal modifies the rules for so-called "closed" MEPs and clarifies rules with respect to MEPs sponsored by a professional employer organization. The proposed regulations provide that a bona fide group or association of employers and bona fide PEOs are deemed to be acting in the interests of an employer, and thus, can establish a pension plan so long as they satisfy the DOL's regulatory requirements.
Source: Wagnerlawgroup.com, October 2018
Abstract: The proposed rules that the DOL just published offered pretty much nothing. While it offered more guidance on how associations and professional employer organizations could sponsor MEPs, it did nothing with its restriction on requiring commonality among adopting employers. So the door for Open MEPs remains closed.
Source: Jdsupra.com, October 2018
Abstract: The DOL has issued proposed regulations that would interpret ERISA's definition of "employer" to allow certain groups or associations of employers, and certain professional employer organizations, to establish multiple employer defined contribution retirement plans. The proposed regulations would permit MEPs to be established and maintained by "a bona fide group or association of employers" or "a bona fide professional employer organization." The proposed regulations also address MEP participation by certain working owners who have no employees.
Source: Thomsonreuters.com, October 2018
Abstract: Following a directive from President Donald Trump, the Labor Department announced a proposed rule making designed to make it easier for small businesses to offer retirement savings plans to their workers through association retirement plans, often referred to as multiple-employer plans, or MEPs.
Source: Thinkadvisor.com, October 2018
Abstract: Historically, the DOL tried to limit the circumstances under which groups of employers could safely access the advantages of participating in a MEP. The proposed regulations clarify that employers may band together into employer groups or professional employer organizations to sponsor a retirement plan if they meet certain requirements.
Source: Sgrlaw.com, October 2018
Abstract: The proposed regulation provides clarity regarding the types of "bona fide" groups or associations of employers and professional employer organizations that are permitted to sponsor MEPs. The proposed regulation is similar in many material respects to the DOL's recently finalized Association Health Plan regulation. This article reviews the proposed regulations and provides detail analysis.
Source: Groom.com, October 2018
Abstract: The DOL has published a set of proposed regulations under Title 29 of the Code of Federal Regulations to expand access to retirement saving options by clarifying the circumstances under which an employer group, association, or professional employer organization may sponsor a workplace retirement plan. These plans allow small businesses to join together to offer defined contribution retirement savings benefits.
Source: Planadviser.com, October 2018
Abstract: The Department of Labor has released proposed rules that would expand access to multiple employer retirement plans for small employers and self-employed workers, while also maintaining fiduciary oversight.
Source: Napa-net.org, October 2018
Abstract: The proposed rule would make it easier for small businesses to offer retirement savings plans to their workers through Association Retirement Plans, which would allow small businesses to band together to offer 401k plans to their employees.
Source: 401khelpcenter.com, October 2018
Abstract: The text of the regulation is still forthcoming, but the Office of Management and Budget has completed its review; so far, we know the regulation is viewed as "major" and "economically significant."
Source: Planadviser.com, October 2018
Abstract: Multiple Employer Plans are making a comeback as regulators and legislators are focusing on methods for having more Americans gain access to retirement savings plans. While multiple employer plans can help to make life easier for smaller employers who want to offer a 401k plan by allowing them to offload responsibilities, they have disadvantages as well as advantages.
Source: 401ktv.com, October 2018
Abstract: The president's executive order put multiple employer plans front-and-center. Pentegra's Pete Swisher fills us in on what happens now.
Source: 401kspecialistmag.com, October 2018
Abstract: Should Congress or federal regulators eliminate the common nexus and bad apple rules that have held back open multiple employer plans, experts anticipate many more small businesses will jump in.
Source: Planadviser.com, October 2018
Abstract: The DOL is set to formally propose a rule seeking to expand access to workplace retirement plans, less than a month after President Donald J. Trump issued an executive order calling on the agency to do so. The DOL just dropped off a proposed rule to the Office of Management and Budget.
Source: Jdsupra.com, October 2018
401khelpcenter.com, LLC is not the author of the material referenced in this digest unless specifically noted. The material referenced was created, published, maintained, or otherwise posted by institutions or organizations independent of 401khelpcenter.com, LLC. 401khelpcenter.com, LLC does not endorse, approve, certify, or control this material and does not guarantee or assume responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, efficacy, or timeliness of the material. Use of any information obtained from this material is voluntary, and reliance on it should only be undertaken after an independent review of its accuracy, completeness, efficacy, and timeliness. Reference to any specific commercial product, process, or service by trade name, trademark, service mark, manufacturer, or otherwise does not constitute or imply endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by 401khelpcenter.com, LLC.